Home / Companies / Acea SpA / 28 Apr 2025
Acea SpA: meeting of 28 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
43 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Acea SpA meeting of 28 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 13 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
1 nominee; 68.8% of reported votes for; no filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
33 vote records from 9 filers. 0 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
1 nominee; 100.0% of reported votes for; no filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
41 vote records from 29 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 29 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
52 vote records from 10 filers. 1 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
13 vote records from 5 filers. 0 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
59 vote records from 38 filers. 0 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
110 vote records from 38 filers. 0 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
118 vote records from 38 filers. 1 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
28 vote records from 4 filers. 0 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (A)
53 vote records from 34 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 34 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (B)
41 vote records from 29 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 29 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
41 vote records from 29 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 29 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (C)
41 vote records from 29 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 29 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (D)
41 vote records from 29 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 29 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal | 11. Proposal | 12. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | No report | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | No report | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | No report | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | No report | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | No report | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | No report | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | No report | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | No report | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | No report | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | For | For | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| SEI | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Thrivent | No report | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | No report | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Voya | No report | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | No report | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | No report | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Acea SpA meeting?
43 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 28 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 1 of 9 voted against management (11.1%). 5 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Acea SpA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Acea SpA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Acea SpA with a meeting date within three days of 28 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.