Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Akamai Technologies, Inc. / 10 May 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024940 filers reporting

Akamai Technologies, Inc.: meeting of 10 May 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

940 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Akamai Technologies, Inc. meeting of 10 May 2024. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

10 nominees; 94.6% of reported votes for; 54 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

6,615 vote records from 263 filers. 4 of the 262 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

97.0% for0.8% against2.3% other1.5% against management263 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,491 vote records from 922 filers. 57 of the 895 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 27 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

90.5% for5.3% against4.2% other6.4% against management922 filers
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

659 vote records from 260 filers. 20 of the 259 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

91.5% for7.3% against1.2% other7.7% against management260 filers95.9% for4.0% against0.1% other4.1% against management43,761,714 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

698 vote records from 268 filers. 120 of the 267 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

52.6% for44.8% against2.6% other44.9% against management268 filers83.4% for16.5% against0.1% other16.4% against management43,888,307 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,307 vote records from 259 filers. 7 of the 258 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

35.9% for1.9% against62.2% other2.7% against management259 filers85.3% for14.6% against0.1% other14.5% against management87,486,968 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

To vote upon a shareholder proposal regarding a simple majority vote

646 vote records from 258 filers. 240 of the 256 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

91.9% for7.0% against1.2% other93.8% against management258 filers97.0% for2.9% against0.1% other97.1% against management43,424,653 reported shares
7

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

2 vote records from 2 filers. 1 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

50.0% for50.0% against50.0% against management2 filers13.9% for86.1% against13.9% against management3,783 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor6. Proposal
VanguardForForForFor *
BlackRock and iSharesForForForFor *
FidelityForForForFor *
DimensionalForForForFor *
State Street and SPDRForForForFor *
American CenturyForForForFor *
Franklin TempletonForForForFor *
InvescoForForForFor *
EquitableForForForFor *
Charles SchwabForForForFor *
Nuveen and TIAAForForForFor *
ProShares and ProFundsForForForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForFor *
J.P. MorganForForForFor *
Goldman SachsForForForFor *
WisdomTreeForAgainst *ForFor *
PGIM and PrudentialForForForFor *
Jackson National fundsForForForFor *
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForFor *
SEIForForForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForForForFor *
ThriventForForForFor *
Lincoln FinancialForForForFor *
VoyaForForForFor *
First TrustForForForFor *
Russell InvestmentsForForForFor *
NationwideForAgainst *ForFor *
Victory CapitalForForForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForFor *
BNY MellonForForAgainst *For *
PrincipalForForForFor *
Pacific Life fundsForForForFor *
Global XForForAgainst *No report
MFSNo reportForNo reportNo report
TransamericaForForForFor *
Federated HermesNo reportForNo reportNo report
AllianceBernsteinForForForFor *
Hartford FundsNo reportForNo reportNo report
DWSForForForFor *
PIMCOForForAgainst *For *
AllspringForForForFor *
MassMutualForForForFor *
Harbor FundsForForForFor *
VirtusForForForFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForFor *
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo reportNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Akamai Technologies, Inc. meeting?

940 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 10 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 57 of 895 voted against management (6.4%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Akamai Technologies, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Akamai Technologies, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Akamai Technologies, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 10 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.