Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Akamai Technologies, Inc.

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXAKAM · SEC company no. 1086222

Akamai Technologies, Inc.

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
922year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
10.4%91 of 879 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
5.8%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
4across 3 seasons
86.1% for9.9% against4.1% other10.4% against management911 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 922 funds and managers listed Akamai Technologies, Inc. in their Form N-PX filings (2 meetings).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 91 of the 879 filers that reported a position voted against management (10.4%), 3.8 percentage points above the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 5.8% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
13 May 2026year to 30 June 2026916910.4%
14 May 2025year to 30 June 2025906710.8%
5 Oct 2024year to 30 June 2024310.0%
10 May 2024year to 30 June 202494076.4%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Akamai Technologies, Inc.Median company
Reporting filers voting against management10.4%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management5.8%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 13 May 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal A
VanguardForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst
FidelityForAgainst
DimensionalForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForAgainst
American CenturyForAgainst
Franklin TempletonForAgainst
InvescoForFor *
EquitableForAgainst
Charles SchwabForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForFor *
ProShares and ProFundsForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *For *
J.P. MorganAgainst *Against
Goldman SachsForAgainst
WisdomTreeAgainst *Against
PGIM and PrudentialForFor *
Jackson National fundsForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForFor *
SEIForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForAgainst
ThriventForFor *
Lincoln FinancialForFor *
VoyaForAgainst
First TrustForAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst
NationwideForAgainst
Victory CapitalForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForFor *
BNY MellonForFor *
PrincipalForFor *
Capital Group and American FundsAgainst *For *
Pacific Life fundsForAgainst
Global XForFor *
TransamericaForAgainst
Federated HermesForFor *
AllianceBernsteinForFor *
Hartford FundsForFor *
DWSAgainst *For *
PIMCOForFor *
AllspringSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
MassMutualForFor *
Harbor FundsForFor *
VirtusAbstain or withhold *For *
VanEckForFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForFor *
Janus HendersonForAgainst
Neuberger BermanForNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForNo report
Lord AbbettForNo report
BairdForNo report
Artisan PartnersForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20249456.4%withheld
year to 30 June 202591610.8%11.2%
year to 30 June 202692210.4%5.8%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS18,02652.0%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE6,23318.0%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES4,45312.8%
COMPENSATION2,5547.4%
AUDIT-RELATED1,9315.6%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES7422.1%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES6281.8%
CAPITAL STRUCTURE1040.3%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Akamai Technologies, Inc.?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 879 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Akamai Technologies, Inc.; 91 voted against management (10.4%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Akamai Technologies, Inc.?

Filers reported one proposal from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 55.8% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Akamai Technologies, Inc. reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Akamai Technologies, Inc., grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers; the ticker and SEC company number come from the SEC company tickers file, matched on the exact name. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.