Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Akamai Technologies, Inc. / 14 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025906 filers reporting

Akamai Technologies, Inc.: meeting of 14 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

906 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Akamai Technologies, Inc. meeting of 14 May 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

9 nominees; 97.1% of reported votes for; 26 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

5,700 vote records from 241 filers. 2 of the 238 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.3% for0.4% against1.2% other0.8% against management241 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,458 vote records from 893 filers. 94 of the 868 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 25 filers reported this item without a management mark.

85.9% for10.1% against4.0% other10.8% against management893 filers86.7% for12.9% against0.5% other11.2% against management114,042,812 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

635 vote records from 240 filers. 17 of the 237 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

92.1% for6.7% against1.3% other7.2% against management240 filers96.7% for3.3% against0.0% other3.3% against management49,730,038 reported shares
4

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

611 vote records from 50 filers. 0 of the 49 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management50 filers97.1% for0.7% against2.2% other3.8% against management30,687,737 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

664 vote records from 248 filers. 121 of the 245 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

48.8% for49.2% against2.0% other49.4% against management248 filers73.4% for26.6% against0.0% other26.2% against management49,834,883 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

2,689 vote records from 236 filers. 4 of the 234 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

94.5% for0.8% against4.7% other1.7% against management236 filers83.1% for16.9% against0.0% other14.0% against management226,013,710 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

To vote upon a shareholder proposal to give shareholders the ability to call a special shareholder meeting

454 vote records from 183 filers. 124 of the 182 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

67.2% for32.2% against0.5% other68.1% against management183 filers32.9% for67.1% against0.0% other32.9% against management41,378,219 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor7. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForNo report
FidelityForForForAgainst
DimensionalForForForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainst
American CenturyForForForFor *
Franklin TempletonForForForFor *
InvescoForForForFor *
EquitableForForForFor *
Charles SchwabForForForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForNo report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForFor *
J.P. MorganForForForNo report
Goldman SachsForForForAgainst
WisdomTreeForAgainst *ForFor *
PGIM and PrudentialForForForFor *
Jackson National fundsForForForNo report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainst
SEIForForForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForFor *
Lincoln FinancialForForForFor *
VoyaForForForAgainst
First TrustForForForFor *
Russell InvestmentsForForForFor *
NationwideForForForFor *
Victory CapitalForForForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForFor *
BNY MellonForAgainst *Against *For *
PrincipalForForForFor *
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportSplit or no voteNo reportNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
Global XForForAgainst *No report
MFSNo reportForNo reportNo report
TransamericaForForForAgainst
Federated HermesForForForFor *
AllianceBernsteinForForForFor *
Hartford FundsNo reportForNo reportNo report
DWSForForForFor *
PIMCOForForAgainst *For *
AllspringForForForAgainst
MassMutualForForForAgainst
Harbor FundsForForForNo report
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForFor *
Janus HendersonForForForFor *
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo reportNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Akamai Technologies, Inc. meeting?

906 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 14 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 94 of 868 voted against management (10.8%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Akamai Technologies, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Akamai Technologies, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Akamai Technologies, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 14 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.