Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Aker BP ASA / 30 Apr 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024149 filers reporting

Aker BP ASA: meeting of 30 Apr 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

149 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Aker BP ASA meeting of 30 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 49.1% of reported votes for; 108 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

434 vote records from 135 filers. 23 of the 131 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

19.3% for18.5% against62.2% other17.6% against management135 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

55 vote records from 33 filers. 4 of the 32 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

81.8% for12.1% against6.1% other12.5% against management33 filers80.7% for17.5% against1.8% other17.5% against management2,561,913 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

243 vote records from 135 filers. 102 of the 131 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

20.0% for77.0% against3.0% other77.9% against management135 filers37.4% for60.6% against2.0% other61.6% against management48,459,112 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

724 vote records from 135 filers. 100 of the 131 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

20.7% for76.3% against3.0% other76.3% against management135 filers66.9% for31.1% against2.0% other31.6% against management145,270,822 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

695 vote records from 135 filers. 0 of the 131 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.0% for0.0% against3.0% other0.0% against management135 filers96.8% for1.3% against1.9% other1.3% against management144,016,474 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

748 vote records from 135 filers. 0 of the 131 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.0% for0.0% against3.0% other0.0% against management135 filers97.0% for0.2% against2.7% other0.2% against management148,521,388 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

271 vote records from 20 filers. 0 of the 20 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

90.0% for0.0% against10.0% other0.0% against management20 filers54.2% for13.6% against32.2% other1.9% against management3,034,345 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Discuss with Stakeholders Company's Position and Mutually Acceptable Solution

235 vote records from 131 filers. 17 of the 127 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

12.2% for84.7% against3.1% other13.4% against management131 filers8.0% for90.1% against2.0% other8.7% against management47,981,198 reported shares
9

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0.0% for100.0% against0.0% against management1 filers0.0% for100.0% against0.0% against management6,380 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor8. Proposal
VanguardSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
BlackRock and iSharesSplit or no voteNo reportForAgainst
FidelityAgainst *No reportAgainst *For *
DimensionalSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
State Street and SPDRSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
American CenturySplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
Franklin TempletonSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
InvescoForNo reportAgainst *Against
EquitableAgainst *No reportForAgainst
Charles SchwabSplit or no voteNo reportSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
Nuveen and TIAAForNo reportAgainst *Against
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *ForAgainst *Against
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertSplit or no voteNo reportForAgainst
J.P. MorganForForForAgainst
Goldman SachsSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
WisdomTreeSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
PGIM and PrudentialSplit or no voteNo reportSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
Jackson National fundsAgainst *ForAgainst *Against
Northern Trust and FlexSharesSplit or no voteForAgainst *Against
SEIForNo reportAgainst *For *
T. Rowe PriceSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
ThriventSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
Lincoln FinancialSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
VoyaSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
First TrustSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
Russell InvestmentsForNo reportAgainst *For *
NationwideSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
Victory CapitalSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
Brighthouse FundsAgainstNo reportAgainstAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
BNY MellonSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
PrincipalForNo reportAgainst *For *
Capital Group and American FundsForNo reportAgainst *Against
Pacific Life fundsSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *For *
Global XForNo reportAgainst *No report
MFSAgainst *No reportForAgainst
TransamericaSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
Federated HermesForNo reportAgainst *Against
AllianceBernsteinSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
Hartford FundsForNo reportAgainst *For *
PIMCOSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
MassMutualSplit or no voteForAgainst *Against
VirtusSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against
Janus HendersonSplit or no voteNo reportAgainst *Against

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Aker BP ASA meeting?

149 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 4 of 32 voted against management (12.5%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Aker BP ASA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Aker BP ASA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Aker BP ASA with a meeting date within three days of 30 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.