Home / Companies / Aker BP ASA / 30 Apr 2024
Aker BP ASA: meeting of 30 Apr 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
149 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Aker BP ASA meeting of 30 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 49.1% of reported votes for; 108 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
434 vote records from 135 filers. 23 of the 131 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
55 vote records from 33 filers. 4 of the 32 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
243 vote records from 135 filers. 102 of the 131 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
724 vote records from 135 filers. 100 of the 131 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
695 vote records from 135 filers. 0 of the 131 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
748 vote records from 135 filers. 0 of the 131 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
271 vote records from 20 filers. 0 of the 20 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Discuss with Stakeholders Company's Position and Mutually Acceptable Solution
235 vote records from 131 filers. 17 of the 127 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | Split or no vote | No report | For | Against |
| Fidelity | Against * | No report | Against * | For * |
| Dimensional | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| American Century | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| Invesco | For | No report | Against * | Against |
| Equitable | Against * | No report | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | Against * | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | For | Against * | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Split or no vote | No report | For | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| WisdomTree | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Jackson National funds | Against * | For | Against * | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Split or no vote | For | Against * | Against |
| SEI | For | No report | Against * | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| Thrivent | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| Voya | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| First Trust | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | Against * | For * |
| Nationwide | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| Victory Capital | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | Against | No report | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| BNY Mellon | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| Principal | For | No report | Against * | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | Against * | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | For * |
| Global X | For | No report | Against * | No report |
| MFS | Against * | No report | For | Against |
| Transamerica | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | Against * | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | Against * | For * |
| PIMCO | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| MassMutual | Split or no vote | For | Against * | Against |
| Virtus | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
| Janus Henderson | Split or no vote | No report | Against * | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Aker BP ASA meeting?
149 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 4 of 32 voted against management (12.5%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Aker BP ASA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Aker BP ASA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Aker BP ASA with a meeting date within three days of 30 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.