Home / Companies / Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.
How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026
- Filers reporting
- 225year to 30 June 2026
- Against management on pay
- 2.3%3 of 128 reporting filers
- Same, by reported shares
- 7.1%shares reported on Form N-PX
- Meetings on file
- 5across 3 seasons
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
For the year to 30 June 2026, 225 funds and managers listed Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. in their Form N-PX filings (one meeting).
On the advisory vote on executive pay, 3 of the 128 filers that reported a position voted against management (2.3%), 4.2 percentage points below the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 7.1% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.
All 14 of the largest fund families that reported a say-on-pay vote here voted with management.
Meetings
| Meeting date | Season | Filers reporting | Items | Against management on pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Sep 2025 | year to 30 June 2026 | 223 | 12 | 2.3% |
| 5 Sep 2024 | year to 30 June 2025 | 222 | 12 | 5.2% |
| 9 May 2024 | year to 30 June 2025 | 3 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 7 Sep 2023 | year to 30 June 2024 | 211 | 5 | 4.3% |
| 9 Jul 2023 | year to 30 June 2024 | 3 | 1 | 0.0% |
Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.
Say-on-pay: this company and the median
| year to 30 June 2026 | Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | Median company |
|---|---|---|
| Reporting filers voting against management | 2.3% | 6.6% |
| Reported shares voted against management | 7.1% | 2.9% |
Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.
How the largest families voted
Meeting of 3 Sep 2025: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.
| Family | Say-on-pay | Proposal A | Proposal B | Proposal C | Proposal D | Proposal E | Proposal F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Invesco | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Equitable | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | For * | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| WisdomTree | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For * | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| First Trust | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Victory Capital | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | No report | For * | Against * | Against * | Against * | For * | Against * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| BNY Mellon | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| MFS | No report | For * | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Transamerica | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | No report | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| DWS | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| PIMCO | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | Against | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Lord Abbett | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Baird | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
- Proposal A: Disclose an Emissions Reduction Strategy
- Proposal B: Disclose Languages Mastered by Employees
- Proposal C: Disclose Language Mastered by Executives
- Proposal D: Advisory Vote on Environmental Policies
- Proposal E: Hold Annual Meetings of the Company in Person with Virtual Meetings as Complements
- Proposal F: Establish Formal Action Plan on Minimizing All Forms of Operations Waste
By season
| Season | Filers reporting | Against management on pay, filers | By reported shares | Say-on-pay split |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| year to 30 June 2024 | 214 | 4.3% | 0.4% | |
| year to 30 June 2025 | 225 | 5.2% | 0.4% | |
| year to 30 June 2026 | 225 | 2.3% | 7.1% |
Category mix
Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.
| Category | Vote records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| DIRECTOR ELECTIONS | 11,574 | 70.1% |
| ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE | 1,183 | 7.2% |
| CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 1,057 | 6.4% |
| COMPENSATION | 845 | 5.1% |
| AUDIT-RELATED | 720 | 4.4% |
| SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES | 679 | 4.1% |
| OTHER | 452 | 2.7% |
Questions
How did large funds vote at Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.?
For the year to 30 June 2026, 128 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.; 3 voted against management (2.3%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.
Were there shareholder proposals at Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.?
Filers reported 6 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 5.4% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.
Is this the meeting result?
No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reports on Form 8-K.
Where does the data come from?
From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc., grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.