Home / Companies / Alphabet Inc. / 5 Jun 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 20262,652 filers reporting

Alphabet Inc.: meeting of 5 Jun 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

2,652 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Alphabet Inc. meeting of 5 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 15 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

10 nominees; 83.5% of reported votes for; 440 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

22,319 vote records from 680 filers. 29 of the 671 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

93.7% for4.0% against2.4% other4.3% against management680 filers

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

5,426 vote records from 2,624 filers. 1,182 of the 2,542 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 82 filers reported this item without a management mark.

49.4% for46.4% against4.2% other46.5% against management2,624 filers50.7% for48.8% against0.5% other48.6% against management4,961,494,709 reported shares

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

2,249 vote records from 675 filers. 40 of the 666 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

92.6% for5.6% against1.8% other6.0% against management675 filers99.0% for0.9% against0.0% other0.9% against management1,652,578,734 reported shares

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

2,514 vote records from 682 filers. 211 of the 670 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.

66.7% for31.5% against1.8% other31.5% against management682 filers93.0% for6.9% against0.0% other6.8% against management1,659,289,740 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal regarding a viewpoint diversity risk report

2,242 vote records from 648 filers. 25 of the 639 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.6% for96.0% against3.4% other3.9% against management648 filers0.1% for99.7% against0.3% other0.5% against management1,649,443,773 reported shares

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal regarding a report on AI data usage oversight

2,164 vote records from 647 filers. 302 of the 638 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

44.2% for52.2% against3.6% other47.3% against management647 filers14.3% for85.5% against0.3% other14.6% against management1,652,748,222 reported shares

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal regarding a report on AI-generated misinformation

2,138 vote records from 647 filers. 195 of the 638 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

26.9% for69.4% against3.7% other30.6% against management647 filers8.5% for91.2% against0.3% other8.9% against management1,649,484,064 reported shares

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal regarding a report on data privacy

2,137 vote records from 647 filers. 75 of the 638 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

8.5% for88.1% against3.4% other11.8% against management647 filers1.2% for98.5% against0.3% other1.6% against management1,649,423,595 reported shares

ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder

Shareholder proposal regarding a report on water usage and AI development

2,137 vote records from 647 filers. 36 of the 638 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2.5% for94.1% against3.4% other5.6% against management647 filers0.5% for99.2% against0.3% other1.0% against management1,649,492,185 reported shares

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal regarding AI Board oversight

2,137 vote records from 647 filers. 76 of the 638 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

9.3% for88.1% against2.6% other11.9% against management647 filers1.8% for97.9% against0.2% other2.2% against management1,649,423,586 reported shares

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal regarding a report on impact of U.S. immigration policy

2,138 vote records from 648 filers. 59 of the 639 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

5.9% for90.7% against3.4% other9.2% against management648 filers0.9% for98.8% against0.3% other1.4% against management1,649,498,521 reported shares

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal regarding equal shareholder voting

2,111 vote records from 642 filers. 570 of the 633 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

88.3% for10.0% against1.7% other90.0% against management642 filers96.7% for3.2% against0.0% other96.8% against management1,646,097,467 reported shares

ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder

Shareholder proposal regarding an enhanced disclosure on climate goals

2,145 vote records from 642 filers. 111 of the 634 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.

14.3% for82.4% against3.3% other17.5% against management642 filers13.2% for86.5% against0.3% other13.6% against management1,646,167,714 reported shares

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal regarding a report on politicized content moderation

2,103 vote records from 642 filers. 24 of the 634 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.9% for95.8% against3.3% other3.8% against management642 filers0.0% for99.7% against0.3% other0.4% against management1,645,219,047 reported shares

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

476 vote records from 39 filers. 11 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

17.9% for48.7% against33.3% other28.9% against management39 filers34.1% for64.7% against1.2% other37.8% against management15,119,467 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family	1. Directors	2. Say-on-pay	3. Auditor	5. Proposal	6. Proposal	7. Proposal	8. Proposal	9. Proposal
Vanguard	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
BlackRock and iShares	For	Against *	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Fidelity	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Dimensional	Split or no vote	Against *	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
State Street and SPDR	For	For	For	Against	For *	For *	Against	Against
American Century	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Franklin Templeton	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Invesco	For	Against *	For	Against	For *	Against	Against	Against
Equitable	Against *	Against *	For	Against	For *	For *	Against	Against
Charles Schwab	For	Against *	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Nuveen and TIAA	For	For	For	Against	For *	For *	Against	Against
ProShares and ProFunds	For	Against *	For	Against	For *	Against	Against	Against
John Hancock and Manulife	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert	For	Against *	For	Against	For *	For *	Against	Against
J.P. Morgan	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Goldman Sachs	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
WisdomTree	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
PGIM and Prudential	For	Against *	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Jackson National funds	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Northern Trust and FlexShares	For	For	For	Against	For *	Against	Against	Against
SEI	For	Against *	For	Against	For *	For *	Against	Against
T. Rowe Price	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Thrivent	For	Against *	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Lincoln Financial	For	For	For	Against	For *	For *	Against	Against
Voya	Against *	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
First Trust	For	Against *	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Russell Investments	For	Against *	For	Against	For *	For *	Against	Against
Nationwide	For	Against *	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Victory Capital	For	Against *	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Brighthouse Funds	For	Against	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Guggenheim and Rydex	For	Against *	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Columbia Threadneedle	For	Against *	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
BNY Mellon	For	For	Against *	Against	For *	Against	Against	Against
Principal	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Capital Group and American Funds	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Pacific Life funds	For	Against *	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Global X	For	Against *	For	Against	For *	For *	Against	Against
MFS	For	Against *	For	Against	For *	For *	Against	Against
Transamerica	For	Against *	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Federated Hermes	For	For	For	Against	For *	Against	Against	Against
AllianceBernstein	Against *	Against *	For	Against	For *	For *	Against	Against
Hartford Funds	For	Against *	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
DWS	For	Against *	For	Against	For *	For *	For *	Against
PIMCO	For	Against *	For	Against	For *	Against	Against	Against
Allspring	For	Against *	For	Against	For *	Against	Against	Against
MassMutual	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Harbor Funds	For	Against *	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Virtus	For	Against *	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
VanEck	For	Against *	For	Against	For *	For *	Against	Against
Macquarie and Delaware Funds	For	Against *	For	Against	For *	Against	Against	Against
Janus Henderson	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Neuberger Berman	For	Against *	For	Against	For *	For *	For *	Against
American Beacon	For	Against *	For	Against	Against	For *	Against	Against
Natixis and Loomis Sayles	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Lord Abbett	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Dodge & Cox	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Harris Associates and Oakmark	For	For	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against
Baird	For	Against *	For	Against	For *	Against	Against	Against
Artisan Partners	For	Against *	For	Against	Against	Against	Against	Against

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Alphabet Inc. meeting?

2,652 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 5 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 1,182 of 2,542 voted against management (46.5%). 10 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Alphabet Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Alphabet Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Alphabet Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 5 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.