Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Alphabet Inc.

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXGOOGL · SEC company no. 1652044

Alphabet Inc.

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
2,670year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
46.5%1,182 of 2,542 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
48.6%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
9across 3 seasons
49.4% for46.4% against4.2% other46.5% against management2,624 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 2,670 funds and managers listed Alphabet Inc. in their Form N-PX filings (4 meetings).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 1,182 of the 2,542 filers that reported a position voted against management (46.5%), 39.9 percentage points above the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 48.6% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
5 Jun 2026year to 30 June 20262,6521546.5%
6 May 2026year to 30 June 20268140.0%
6 Apr 2026year to 30 June 20264175.0%
6 Jun 2025year to 30 June 20257091722.9%
16 May 2025year to 30 June 2025730.0%
6 Jul 2024year to 30 June 202442100.0%
7 Jun 2024year to 30 June 20247531635.5%
22 May 2024year to 30 June 2024420.0%
2 Jun 2023year to 30 June 20245220.0%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Alphabet Inc.Median company
Reporting filers voting against management46.5%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management48.6%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 5 Jun 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal AProposal BProposal CProposal DProposal EProposal FProposal G
VanguardForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
FidelityForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
DimensionalAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
State Street and SPDRForAgainstFor *For *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
American CenturyForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Franklin TempletonForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
InvescoAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
EquitableAgainst *AgainstFor *For *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Charles SchwabAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainstFor *For *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *AgainstFor *For *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
J.P. MorganForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Jackson National fundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
SEIAgainst *AgainstFor *For *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
ThriventAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForAgainstFor *For *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VoyaForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
First TrustAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Russell InvestmentsAgainst *AgainstFor *For *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
NationwideAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Victory CapitalAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Brighthouse FundsAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Guggenheim and RydexAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BNY MellonForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PrincipalForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Pacific Life fundsAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Global XAgainst *AgainstFor *For *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
MFSAgainst *AgainstFor *For *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
TransamericaAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Federated HermesForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
AllianceBernsteinAgainst *AgainstFor *For *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Hartford FundsAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
DWSAgainst *AgainstFor *For *For *AgainstFor *Against
PIMCOAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
AllspringAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
MassMutualForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Harbor FundsAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *Against
VirtusAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VanEckAgainst *AgainstFor *For *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Janus HendersonForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Neuberger BermanAgainst *AgainstFor *For *For *AgainstFor *Against
American BeaconAgainst *AgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lord AbbettForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Dodge & CoxForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Harris Associates and OakmarkForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BairdAgainst *AgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Artisan PartnersAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 202476835.5%24.1%
year to 30 June 202572622.9%14.1%
year to 30 June 20262,67046.5%48.6%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS62,61442.6%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES39,41926.8%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE8,6185.9%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES7,0334.8%
COMPENSATION6,3494.3%
AUDIT-RELATED6,0154.1%
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE5,9054.0%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES5,8124.0%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE5,2433.6%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Alphabet Inc.?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 2,542 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Alphabet Inc.; 1,182 voted against management (46.5%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Alphabet Inc.?

Filers reported 10 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 8.6% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Alphabet Inc. reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Alphabet Inc., grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers; the ticker and SEC company number come from the SEC company tickers file, matched on the exact name. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.