Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Alphabet Inc. / 6 Jun 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025709 filers reporting

Alphabet Inc.: meeting of 6 Jun 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

709 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Alphabet Inc. meeting of 6 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 17 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

10 nominees; 64.2% of reported votes for; 481 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

21,490 vote records from 643 filers. 164 of the 634 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

67.3% for26.0% against6.7% other25.9% against management643 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

232 vote records from 53 filers. 11 of the 48 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

49.1% for39.6% against11.3% other22.9% against management53 filers14.3% for83.9% against1.8% other14.1% against management19,903,274 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

1,889 vote records from 619 filers. 52 of the 611 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.

89.8% for8.6% against1.6% other8.5% against management619 filers98.7% for1.3% against0.0% other1.3% against management1,421,763,130 reported shares
4

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

152 vote records from 43 filers. 11 of the 41 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

62.8% for25.6% against11.6% other26.8% against management43 filers99.0% for0.9% against0.1% other0.4% against management169,134,429 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder

Report on Due Diligence Process to Assess Human Rights Risks in High-Risk Countries

2,079 vote records from 608 filers. 77 of the 599 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

9.5% for86.7% against3.8% other12.9% against management608 filers1.4% for98.3% against0.3% other1.9% against management1,585,152,543 reported shares
6

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Stockholder proposal regarding a report on charitable partnerships

2,019 vote records from 607 filers. 38 of the 599 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.

3.1% for93.1% against3.8% other6.3% against management607 filers0.8% for98.9% against0.3% other1.2% against management1,581,233,506 reported shares
7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Stockholder proposal regarding "Support for Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent"

2,040 vote records from 607 filers. 165 of the 598 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

25.9% for72.8% against1.3% other27.6% against management607 filers15.4% for84.6% against0.0% other15.5% against management1,581,621,324 reported shares
8

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Stockholder proposal regarding a report on alignment of lobbying activities with child safety policies

2,046 vote records from 605 filers. 115 of the 596 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

15.9% for80.5% against3.6% other19.3% against management605 filers5.4% for94.3% against0.3% other5.8% against management1,585,114,701 reported shares
9

ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder

Stockholder proposal regarding an enhanced disclosure on climate goals

2,038 vote records from 604 filers. 118 of the 595 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

16.7% for79.8% against3.5% other19.8% against management604 filers11.6% for88.1% against0.3% other12.1% against management1,581,128,569 reported shares
10

HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder

Stockholder proposal regarding a human rights impact assessment of Al-driven targeted ad policies

2,015 vote records from 604 filers. 288 of the 596 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.

44.2% for51.7% against4.1% other48.3% against management604 filers11.8% for87.9% against0.3% other12.2% against management1,581,216,103 reported shares
11

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Stockholder proposal regarding a report on Al data usage oversight

2,018 vote records from 606 filers. 272 of the 597 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

40.8% for54.1% against5.1% other45.6% against management606 filers10.0% for89.2% against0.9% other10.9% against management1,581,232,109 reported shares
12

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Stockholder proposal regarding a report on risks of discrimination in GenAl

1,990 vote records from 601 filers. 36 of the 592 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2.8% for93.3% against3.8% other6.1% against management601 filers0.1% for99.5% against0.4% other0.6% against management1,577,471,982 reported shares
13

COMPENSATIONSecurity holder

Stockholder proposal regarding a financial performance policy

1,994 vote records from 606 filers. 23 of the 598 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.

3.1% for95.4% against1.5% other3.8% against management606 filers0.2% for99.8% against0.0% other0.3% against management1,577,933,240 reported shares
14

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Stockholder proposal regarding a report on online safety for children

1,986 vote records from 600 filers. 154 of the 591 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

23.0% for73.5% against3.5% other26.1% against management600 filers14.9% for84.8% against0.3% other15.3% against management1,577,400,008 reported shares
15

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Stockholder proposal regarding a request to cease DEI participation

1,987 vote records from 600 filers. 37 of the 593 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.

3.2% for93.2% against3.7% other6.2% against management600 filers0.9% for98.8% against0.3% other1.3% against management1,577,400,333 reported shares
16

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESSecurity holder

Stockholder proposal regarding equal shareholder voting

1,987 vote records from 599 filers. 524 of the 590 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

87.5% for11.0% against1.5% other88.8% against management599 filers95.5% for4.5% against0.0% other95.5% against management1,577,368,277 reported shares
17

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

570 vote records from 41 filers. 13 of the 39 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

14.6% for73.2% against12.2% other33.3% against management41 filers21.7% for77.2% against1.1% other32.3% against management23,240,256 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors3. Auditor5. Proposal6. Proposal7. Proposal8. Proposal9. Proposal10. Proposal
VanguardForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
FidelityForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *Against
DimensionalAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
American CenturyForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Franklin TempletonForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
InvescoForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
EquitableForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Charles SchwabForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Nuveen and TIAAForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstFor *
ProShares and ProFundsAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *Against *For *AgainstAgainstFor *For *For *
J.P. MorganForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeSplit or no voteForAgainstFor *For *AgainstAgainstAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Jackson National fundsForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *
SEIForForAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstFor *
T. Rowe PriceForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
ThriventAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VoyaAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
First TrustAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForForAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstFor *
NationwideForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Victory CapitalAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Brighthouse FundsForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Guggenheim and RydexAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BNY MellonForForAgainstFor *For *AgainstAgainstAgainst
PrincipalForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsForForAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Global XForForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
MFSSplit or no voteForAgainstAgainstFor *For *AgainstFor *
TransamericaForForAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
Federated HermesForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
AllianceBernsteinAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Hartford FundsForForAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
DWSForForFor *AgainstAgainstFor *AgainstFor *
AllspringAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
MassMutualForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Harbor FundsForForAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstAgainst
VirtusAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
VanEckForForAgainstAgainstFor *AgainstAgainstFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *For *For *
Janus HendersonAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Neuberger BermanForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
American BeaconForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lord AbbettForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Dodge & CoxForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Harris Associates and OakmarkForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BairdAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Artisan PartnersForForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Alphabet Inc. meeting?

709 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 11 of 48 voted against management (22.9%). 12 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Alphabet Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Alphabet Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Alphabet Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 6 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.