Home / Companies / Ambev SA / 30 Apr 2026
Ambev SA: meeting of 30 Apr 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
51 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Ambev SA meeting of 30 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 46.0% of reported votes for; 34 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
675 vote records from 44 filers. 24 of the 42 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
8 vote records from 7 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
75 vote records from 13 filers. 0 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
40 vote records from 11 filers. 2 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
125 vote records from 40 filers. 0 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
166 vote records from 43 filers. 0 of the 41 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
437 vote records from 44 filers. 0 of the 42 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
24 vote records from 12 filers. 0 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (A)
45 vote records from 25 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 25 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (B)
45 vote records from 25 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 25 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 3. Auditor | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Against * | No report | Abstain or withhold | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | Against * | No report | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | For | No report | Abstain or withhold | For |
| Dimensional | Against * | No report | Abstain or withhold | For |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | No report | Abstain or withhold | For |
| American Century | Against * | No report | Abstain or withhold | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Against * | No report | Abstain or withhold | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | No report | No report |
| SEI | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Voya | Against * | No report | Abstain or withhold | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Nationwide | For | No report | Abstain or withhold | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Against * | No report | Abstain or withhold | For |
| MFS | Against * | No report | Abstain or withhold | For |
| Allspring | Against * | No report | Abstain or withhold | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Against * | No report | Abstain or withhold | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Ambev SA meeting?
51 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 0 of 6 voted against management (0.0%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Ambev SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Ambev SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Ambev SA with a meeting date within three days of 30 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.