Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Amdocs Limited / 2 Feb 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 2024235 filers reporting

Amdocs Limited: meeting of 2 Feb 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

235 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Amdocs Limited meeting of 2 Feb 2024. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

10 nominees; 94.7% of reported votes for; 58 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

4,800 vote records from 229 filers. 4 of the 226 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided

96.5% for1.3% against2.2% other1.8% against management229 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

6 vote records from 6 filers. 0 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

66.7% for0.0% against33.3% other0.0% against management6 filers99.9% for0.0% against0.1% other0.0% against management96,958 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

485 vote records from 229 filers. 7 of the 226 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

95.6% for2.6% against1.7% other3.1% against management229 filers
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

478 vote records from 227 filers. 1 of the 224 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided

98.7% for0.0% against1.3% other0.4% against management227 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management8,349,011,403 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

477 vote records from 227 filers. 17 of the 224 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided

90.7% for7.5% against1.8% other7.6% against management227 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management8,348,975,236 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

425 vote records from 199 filers. 1 of the 198 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided

99.5% for0.0% against0.5% other0.5% against management199 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management8,346,599,126 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

54 vote records from 29 filers. 0 of the 28 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

93.1% for0.0% against6.9% other0.0% against management29 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management2,436,758 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors3. Auditor
VanguardForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForFor
FidelityForFor
DimensionalForFor
State Street and SPDRForFor
American CenturyForFor
Franklin TempletonForFor
InvescoForFor
EquitableForFor
Charles SchwabForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForFor
J.P. MorganForFor
Goldman SachsForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForFor
Jackson National fundsForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForFor
SEIForFor
T. Rowe PriceForFor
Lincoln FinancialForFor
VoyaForFor
First TrustForFor
Russell InvestmentsForFor
NationwideForFor
Victory CapitalForFor
Brighthouse FundsForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForFor
BNY MellonForFor
PrincipalForFor
Pacific Life fundsForFor
Global XForFor
MFSForFor
TransamericaForFor
AllianceBernsteinForFor
Hartford FundsForFor
DWSForFor
PIMCOSplit or no voteAgainst *
AllspringForFor
MassMutualForFor
VirtusForFor
VanEckForFor
Janus HendersonForFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Amdocs Limited meeting?

235 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 2 Feb 2024. On say-on-pay, 0 of 4 voted against management (0.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Amdocs Limited on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Amdocs Limited

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Amdocs Limited with a meeting date within three days of 2 Feb 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.