Home / Companies / ams-OSRAM AG / 14 Jun 2024
ams-OSRAM AG: meeting of 14 Jun 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
56 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the ams-OSRAM AG meeting of 14 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 94.8% of reported votes for; one filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
140 vote records from 50 filers. 0 of the 44 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
13 vote records from 12 filers. 4 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
70 vote records from 50 filers. 2 of the 44 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
210 vote records from 50 filers. 0 of the 44 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
64 vote records from 44 filers. 31 of the 41 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
213 vote records from 50 filers. 0 of the 44 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
30 vote records from 6 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Equitable | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | Against * | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| First Trust | For | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | Against * |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Split or no vote | No report | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For |
| Global X | For | No report | For |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For |
| Allspring | For | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the ams-OSRAM AG meeting?
56 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 14 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 4 of 8 voted against management (50.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by ams-OSRAM AG on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for ams-OSRAM AG
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing ams-OSRAM AG with a meeting date within three days of 14 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.