Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Arcelik AS / 28 Mar 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 202529 filers reporting

Arcelik AS: meeting of 28 Mar 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

29 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Arcelik AS meeting of 28 Mar 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

1 nominee; 91.2% of reported votes for; 3 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

34 vote records from 24 filers. 3 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

87.5% for12.5% against12.5% against management24 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

20 vote records from 8 filers. 4 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

25.0% for50.0% against25.0% other57.1% against management8 filers2.2% for97.8% against97.8% against management5,497,438 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

25 vote records from 21 filers. 0 of the 21 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management21 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management6,336,591 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

85 vote records from 25 filers. 3 of the 25 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

88.0% for0.0% against12.0% other12.0% against management25 filers66.2% for31.8% against2.0% other33.8% against management20,208,088 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

55 vote records from 24 filers. 1 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0.0% for4.2% against95.8% other4.2% against management24 filers50.0% for50.0% against50.0% against management13,467,067 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

179 vote records from 25 filers. 0 of the 25 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management25 filers96.7% for0.0% against3.3% other3.3% against management36,425,922 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

28 vote records from 24 filers. 21 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

12.5% for87.5% against87.5% against management24 filers5.9% for94.1% against94.1% against management6,736,029 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

32 vote records from 20 filers. 0 of the 20 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

95.0% for0.0% against5.0% other0.0% against management20 filers99.8% for0.0% against0.2% other0.2% against management6,051,058 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForNo reportFor
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst *No report
FidelityForNo reportFor
DimensionalForNo reportFor
State Street and SPDRForNo reportFor
American CenturyAgainst *No reportFor
Charles SchwabForNo reportFor
Nuveen and TIAAAgainst *No reportFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForNo reportFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
First TrustForNo reportFor
BNY MellonForNo reportFor
PIMCOForNo reportFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Arcelik AS meeting?

29 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 28 Mar 2025. On say-on-pay, 4 of 7 voted against management (57.1%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Arcelik AS on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Arcelik AS

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Arcelik AS with a meeting date within three days of 28 Mar 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.