Vote Scores

Home / Companies / ARCELORMITTAL / 6 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025126 filers reporting

ARCELORMITTAL: meeting of 6 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

126 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the ARCELORMITTAL meeting of 6 May 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 100.0% of reported votes for; no filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

89 vote records from 30 filers. 0 of the 30 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management30 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

112 vote records from 100 filers. 32 of the 93 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.

58.0% for31.0% against11.0% other34.4% against management100 filers81.8% for18.1% against0.0% other18.2% against management3,073,190 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

43 vote records from 28 filers. 0 of the 28 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management28 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management4,557,212 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

127 vote records from 28 filers. 0 of the 28 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management28 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management13,977,040 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

106 vote records from 29 filers. 0 of the 29 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management29 filers95.8% for4.2% against2.1% against management12,795,181 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

106 vote records from 28 filers. 0 of the 28 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management28 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management12,805,846 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

32 vote records from 10 filers. 0 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management10 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management618,775 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
DimensionalForNo reportFor
State Street and SPDRForNo reportFor
American CenturyForNo reportFor
ProShares and ProFundsForNo reportFor
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesNo reportForNo report
First TrustForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForNo reportFor
Guggenheim and RydexForNo reportFor
BNY MellonForNo reportFor
PrincipalForNo reportFor
MassMutualNo reportForNo report
VanEckForNo reportFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportAgainst *No report
BairdNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the ARCELORMITTAL meeting?

126 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 32 of 93 voted against management (34.4%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by ARCELORMITTAL on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for ARCELORMITTAL

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing ARCELORMITTAL with a meeting date within three days of 6 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.