Home / Companies / ASTRAZENECA PLC / 11 Apr 2024
ASTRAZENECA PLC: meeting of 11 Apr 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
611 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the ASTRAZENECA PLC meeting of 11 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 97.5% of reported votes for; 56 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
6,231 vote records from 240 filers. 1 of the 236 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
518 vote records from 394 filers. 30 of the 373 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 21 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
962 vote records from 240 filers. 2 of the 236 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
2,301 vote records from 237 filers. 0 of the 233 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,342 vote records from 246 filers. 89 of the 242 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
947 vote records from 238 filers. 1 of the 234 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
452 vote records from 230 filers. 4 of the 227 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
188 vote records from 46 filers. 0 of the 44 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
22 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Equitable | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | For | No report |
| SEI | For | No report | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For |
| Voya | For | No report | For |
| First Trust | For | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For |
| Principal | For | No report | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For |
| Global X | For | No report | For |
| Transamerica | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For |
| DWS | For | No report | For |
| MassMutual | For | For | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For |
| Virtus | For | No report | For |
| VanEck | For | No report | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | No report | For |
| Janus Henderson | For | No report | For |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report | For |
| American Beacon | For | No report | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For |
| Baird | No report | For | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the ASTRAZENECA PLC meeting?
611 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 11 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 30 of 373 voted against management (8.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by ASTRAZENECA PLC on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for ASTRAZENECA PLC
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing ASTRAZENECA PLC with a meeting date within three days of 11 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.