Home / Companies / AT&T INC. / 14 May 2026
AT&T INC.: meeting of 14 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,867 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the AT&T INC. meeting of 14 May 2026. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 95.2% of reported votes for; 43 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
11,540 vote records from 399 filers. 4 of the 398 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
3,855 vote records from 1,851 filers. 91 of the 1,794 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 57 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,150 vote records from 395 filers. 17 of the 394 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
162 vote records from 71 filers. 0 of the 71 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
2,225 vote records from 414 filers. 2 of the 412 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,110 vote records from 383 filers. 47 of the 381 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder
EEO-1 Report Disclosure Policy
1,106 vote records from 378 filers. 111 of the 376 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent
1,106 vote records from 378 filers. 168 of the 376 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
24 vote records from 11 filers. 2 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Equitable | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | Against * | Against | For * |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | For * | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| MFS | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | Against * | For * | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the AT&T INC. meeting?
1,867 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 14 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 91 of 1,794 voted against management (5.1%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by AT&T INC. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for AT&T INC.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing AT&T INC. with a meeting date within three days of 14 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.