Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Beijer Ref AB / 24 Apr 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025100 filers reporting

Beijer Ref AB: meeting of 24 Apr 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

100 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Beijer Ref AB meeting of 24 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

9 nominees; 52.1% of reported votes for; 66 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,588 vote records from 83 filers. 44 of the 74 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

30.1% for54.2% against15.7% other59.5% against management83 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

81 vote records from 31 filers. 4 of the 30 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

83.9% for12.9% against3.2% other13.3% against management31 filers87.1% for12.9% against12.9% against management21,951,221 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

335 vote records from 83 filers. 1 of the 74 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

86.7% for1.2% against12.0% other1.4% against management83 filers99.7% for0.1% against0.2% other0.1% against management55,429,155 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

364 vote records from 83 filers. 0 of the 74 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

80.7% for0.0% against19.3% other0.0% against management83 filers99.0% for0.8% against0.2% other0.8% against management58,096,476 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

725 vote records from 84 filers. 44 of the 75 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

27.4% for53.6% against19.0% other58.7% against management84 filers77.3% for22.5% against0.3% other22.5% against management127,900,978 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

2,449 vote records from 83 filers. 1 of the 74 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

86.7% for1.2% against12.0% other1.4% against management83 filers97.2% for2.3% against0.4% other2.4% against management359,248,680 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

200 vote records from 12 filers. 0 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

66.7% for0.0% against33.3% other0.0% against management12 filers46.0% for0.0% against54.0% other0.0% against management538,801 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardAgainst *No reportFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityAgainst *No reportFor
DimensionalSplit or no voteNo reportSplit or no vote
State Street and SPDRAgainst *No reportFor
American CenturyAgainst *No reportFor
Franklin TempletonAgainst *No reportFor
InvescoSplit or no voteNo reportSplit or no vote
EquitableAgainst *No reportFor
Charles SchwabForNo reportFor
Nuveen and TIAAForNo reportFor
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *ForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *No reportFor
J.P. MorganForForFor
WisdomTreeAgainst *No reportFor
PGIM and PrudentialSplit or no voteNo reportFor
Jackson National fundsAgainst *ForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesAgainst *ForFor
T. Rowe PriceForNo reportFor
ThriventAgainst *No reportFor
Lincoln FinancialAgainst *No reportFor
VoyaAgainst *No reportFor
Russell InvestmentsForNo reportFor
NationwideAgainst *No reportFor
Brighthouse FundsAgainst *No reportFor
BNY MellonAgainst *No reportFor
PrincipalAgainst *No reportFor
Capital Group and American FundsForNo reportFor
TransamericaForNo reportFor
AllianceBernsteinAgainst *No reportFor
PIMCOAgainst *No reportFor
AllspringSplit or no voteNo reportSplit or no vote
MassMutualNo reportForNo report
Artisan PartnersForNo reportFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Beijer Ref AB meeting?

100 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 24 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 4 of 30 voted against management (13.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Beijer Ref AB on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Beijer Ref AB

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Beijer Ref AB with a meeting date within three days of 24 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.