Home / Companies / BP P.L.C. / 17 Apr 2025
BP P.L.C.: meeting of 17 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
570 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the BP P.L.C. meeting of 17 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 96.0% of reported votes for; 13 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,914 vote records from 104 filers. 1 of the 101 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
605 vote records from 495 filers. 23 of the 481 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 14 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
327 vote records from 104 filers. 2 of the 101 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
46 vote records from 15 filers. 0 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
604 vote records from 100 filers. 3 of the 97 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
423 vote records from 101 filers. 2 of the 99 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
289 vote records from 100 filers. 2 of the 97 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
144 vote records from 90 filers. 2 of the 88 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
77 vote records from 33 filers. 0 of the 31 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Equitable | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | For | No report |
| SEI | For | No report | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For |
| Thrivent | No report | For | No report |
| First Trust | For | For | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For |
| Principal | For | No report | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For |
| Global X | For | No report | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| VanEck | For | No report | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the BP P.L.C. meeting?
570 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 17 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 23 of 481 voted against management (4.8%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by BP P.L.C. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for BP P.L.C.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing BP P.L.C. with a meeting date within three days of 17 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.