Home / Companies / BRF SA / 31 Mar 2025
BRF SA: meeting of 31 Mar 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
62 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the BRF SA meeting of 31 Mar 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
3 nominees; 100.0% of reported votes for; no filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
28 vote records from 9 filers. 0 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
5 vote records from 1 filers. 1 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
32 vote records from 7 filers. 0 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
88 vote records from 60 filers. 0 of the 60 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
384 vote records from 61 filers. 7 of the 61 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
113 vote records from 54 filers. 6 of the 54 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
24 vote records from 7 filers. 0 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|
| Charles Schwab | For | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report |
| Jackson National funds | No report | For |
| SEI | For | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | No report |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the BRF SA meeting?
62 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 31 Mar 2025. On say-on-pay, 1 of 1 voted against management (100.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by BRF SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for BRF SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing BRF SA with a meeting date within three days of 31 Mar 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.