Home / Companies / Burford Capital Ltd. / 14 May 2025
Burford Capital Ltd.: meeting of 14 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
240 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Burford Capital Ltd. meeting of 14 May 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
6 nominees; 77.2% of reported votes for; 38 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
756 vote records from 73 filers. 3 of the 73 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
335 vote records from 233 filers. 142 of the 219 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 14 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Frequency of the say-on-pay vote
one year: 196 filers; three years: 6 filers; for: 6 filers; abstain: 4 filers; take no action: 3 filers; not applicable: 3 filers.
357 vote records from 230 filers. 7 of the 217 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 13 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
253 vote records from 73 filers. 0 of the 73 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
630 vote records from 73 filers. 0 of the 73 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
255 vote records from 74 filers. 0 of the 74 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
118 vote records from 61 filers. 0 of the 61 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Pay-vote frequency | 4. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Fidelity | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | Split or no vote * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| American Century | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Abstain or withhold * | Split or no vote | For |
| Invesco | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| Equitable | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Goldman Sachs | Split or no vote | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | No report | Against * | Split or no vote | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| Voya | Against * | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| Russell Investments | No report | Against * | Split or no vote | No report |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
| BNY Mellon | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report |
| Principal | No report | Against * | Split or no vote | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | Split or no vote | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| Federated Hermes | Split or no vote | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | Against * | Split or no vote | No report |
| DWS | For | Against * | Split or no vote | For |
| MassMutual | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | Split or no vote | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | Split or no vote | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | Split or no vote | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Burford Capital Ltd. meeting?
240 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 14 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 142 of 219 voted against management (64.8%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Burford Capital Ltd. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Burford Capital Ltd.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Burford Capital Ltd. with a meeting date within three days of 14 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.