Home / Companies / Burford Capital Ltd. / 13 May 2026
Burford Capital Ltd.: meeting of 13 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
273 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Burford Capital Ltd. meeting of 13 May 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
7 nominees; 94.3% of reported votes for; 16 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
966 vote records from 77 filers. 0 of the 77 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
395 vote records from 271 filers. 124 of the 250 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 21 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
278 vote records from 77 filers. 0 of the 77 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
689 vote records from 77 filers. 0 of the 77 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
124 vote records from 68 filers. 0 of the 68 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
13 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | Against * | For |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For |
| American Century | For | Against * | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Abstain or withhold * | For |
| Invesco | For | For | For |
| Equitable | For | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Against * | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | Against * | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | No report | For | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For |
| SEI | For | For | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | Against * | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For |
| Voya | For | Against * | For |
| First Trust | No report | Against * | No report |
| Russell Investments | No report | For | No report |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Against * | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For |
| BNY Mellon | No report | Against * | No report |
| Principal | For | Against * | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against * | For |
| Global X | For | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | Against * | No report |
| DWS | For | Against * | For |
| PIMCO | No report | For | No report |
| Allspring | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| Janus Henderson | No report | Against * | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | For |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Burford Capital Ltd. meeting?
273 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 13 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 124 of 250 voted against management (49.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Burford Capital Ltd. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Burford Capital Ltd.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Burford Capital Ltd. with a meeting date within three days of 13 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.