Vote Scores

Home / Companies / CA Immobilien Anlagen AG / 5 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 202542 filers reporting

CA Immobilien Anlagen AG: meeting of 5 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

42 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the CA Immobilien Anlagen AG meeting of 5 May 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

1 nominee; 42.3% of reported votes for; 24 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

85 vote records from 36 filers. 20 of the 31 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

27.8% for58.3% against13.9% other64.5% against management36 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

32 vote records from 12 filers. 6 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

16.7% for50.0% against33.3% other75.0% against management12 filers
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

63 vote records from 36 filers. 20 of the 31 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

27.8% for52.8% against19.4% other64.5% against management36 filers65.4% for34.1% against0.5% other34.3% against management1,415,307 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

126 vote records from 36 filers. 0 of the 31 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

86.1% for0.0% against13.9% other0.0% against management36 filers99.7% for0.0% against0.3% other0.0% against management2,830,614 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

112 vote records from 37 filers. 0 of the 32 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

18.9% for2.7% against78.4% other0.0% against management37 filers68.9% for30.7% against0.4% other30.6% against management2,186,352 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

172 vote records from 36 filers. 0 of the 28 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.

77.8% for0.0% against22.2% other0.0% against management36 filers99.0% for0.0% against1.0% other0.0% against management1,540,962 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

24 vote records from 4 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for0.0% against100.0% other4 filers

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForNo reportFor
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst *For
FidelityForNo reportAgainst *
DimensionalAgainst *No reportAgainst *
State Street and SPDRAgainst *No reportAgainst *
American CenturyAgainst *No reportAgainst *
EquitableAgainst *No reportAbstain or withhold *
Charles SchwabAgainst *No reportFor
Nuveen and TIAAAgainst *No reportFor
John Hancock and ManulifeSplit or no voteSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *No reportAgainst *
WisdomTreeAgainst *No reportAgainst *
Jackson National fundsSplit or no voteSplit or no voteSplit or no vote
Northern Trust and FlexSharesAgainst *ForAgainst *
SEIAgainst *No reportFor
Brighthouse FundsSplit or no voteNo reportSplit or no vote
BNY MellonAgainst *No reportAgainst *
PIMCOAgainst *No reportAgainst *

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the CA Immobilien Anlagen AG meeting?

42 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 5 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 6 of 8 voted against management (75.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by CA Immobilien Anlagen AG on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for CA Immobilien Anlagen AG

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing CA Immobilien Anlagen AG with a meeting date within three days of 5 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.