Home / Companies / CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE / 4 Apr 2024
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE: meeting of 4 Apr 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
287 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE meeting of 4 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 11 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 99.7% of reported votes for; 4 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,228 vote records from 105 filers. 0 of the 103 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
231 vote records from 194 filers. 7 of the 184 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 10 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
171 vote records from 105 filers. 3 of the 103 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
174 vote records from 93 filers. 2 of the 92 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
7 vote records from 6 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Issue Report Disclosing Exposure on the Oil and Gas Sector
158 vote records from 94 filers. 1 of the 93 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Hold Annual Meetings of the Company in Person with Virtual Meetings as Complements
158 vote records from 94 filers. 51 of the 93 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Disclose Non-Confidential Information Relating to the Bank's Country-by-Country Reporting
158 vote records from 94 filers. 15 of the 93 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Pay Ratio Disclosure
158 vote records from 94 filers. 13 of the 93 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Advisory Vote on Environmental Policy
138 vote records from 84 filers. 19 of the 83 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
75 vote records from 21 filers. 2 of the 21 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| Invesco | For | No report | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | No report | Abstain or withhold * | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Split or no vote | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For | Against | For * | Against | For * | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | No report | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | Abstain or withhold * | Against | Against | Against | For * | No report |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE meeting?
287 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 4 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 7 of 184 voted against management (3.8%). 5 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE with a meeting date within three days of 4 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.