Home / Companies / CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE / 3 Apr 2025
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE: meeting of 3 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
330 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE meeting of 3 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 14 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 98.9% of reported votes for; 3 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,601 vote records from 123 filers. 0 of the 121 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
1 nominee; 0.0% of reported votes for; 7 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
19 vote records from 7 filers. 0 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
405 vote records from 245 filers. 12 of the 225 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 20 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
201 vote records from 123 filers. 2 of the 121 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
334 vote records from 109 filers. 0 of the 107 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
244 vote records from 122 filers. 0 of the 120 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Disclose Industry-Specific Carbon Risk Scoring/Transition Plans
163 vote records from 104 filers. 13 of the 104 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Energy Supply Ratio
188 vote records from 105 filers. 17 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Report on Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Loan Portfolios
164 vote records from 105 filers. 13 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Advisory Vote on Environmental Policies
164 vote records from 105 filers. 15 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Disclose Non-Confidential Information Relating to the Bank's Country-by-Country Reporting
164 vote records from 105 filers. 9 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Disclosure of Language Fluency of Employees
159 vote records from 103 filers. 1 of the 103 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: COMPENSATION
140 vote records from 91 filers. 6 of the 91 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
191 vote records from 17 filers. 2 of the 16 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | No report | For | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | No report | For | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | No report | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | No report | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | No report | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | No report | For | Against * | Against * | Against * | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For | For | Against | Split or no vote | Against | Against |
| PIMCO | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE meeting?
330 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 3 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 12 of 225 voted against management (5.3%). 7 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE with a meeting date within three days of 3 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.