Home / Companies / CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED / 24 Apr 2024
CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED: meeting of 24 Apr 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
715 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED meeting of 24 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 98.9% of reported votes for; 22 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
4,999 vote records from 265 filers. 0 of the 263 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
625 vote records from 494 filers. 18 of the 452 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 42 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
455 vote records from 264 filers. 2 of the 262 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
415 vote records from 223 filers. 5 of the 222 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATEIssuer
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
444 vote records from 258 filers. 33 of the 258 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
33 vote records from 15 filers. 1 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Adopt a Paid Sick Leave Policy
387 vote records from 229 filers. 28 of the 229 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
52 vote records from 27 filers. 3 of the 27 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | Against |
| American Century | For | No report | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | No report | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | No report | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against |
| SEI | For | No report | For | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For | Against |
| Thrivent | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For | Against |
| Voya | For | No report | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | No report | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For | No report |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | Against |
| Principal | For | No report | For | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | For | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For | Against |
| MFS | For | No report | For | Against |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For | No report |
| DWS | For | No report | For | For * |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For | For * |
| Allspring | For | No report | For | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Virtus | For | No report | For | Against |
| Janus Henderson | For | No report | For | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report | For | No report |
| American Beacon | For | No report | For | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | No report | For | Against |
| Cohen & Steers | For | For | For | Against |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | No report | For | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED meeting?
715 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 24 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 18 of 452 voted against management (4.0%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED with a meeting date within three days of 24 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.