Vote Scores

Home / Companies / CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXname as filed

CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
690year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
22.2%116 of 523 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
14.2%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
3across 3 seasons
72.6% for22.7% against4.8% other22.2% against management547 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 690 funds and managers listed CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED in their Form N-PX filings (2 meetings).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 116 of the 523 filers that reported a position voted against management (22.2%), 15.6 percentage points above the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 14.2% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
29 Apr 2026year to 30 June 2026684722.2%
30 Apr 2025year to 30 June 2025695827.3%
24 Apr 2024year to 30 June 202471584.0%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITEDMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management22.2%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management14.2%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 29 Apr 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-pay
VanguardFor
BlackRock and iSharesFor
EquitableAgainst *
Charles SchwabFor
John Hancock and ManulifeFor
J.P. MorganAgainst *
Goldman SachsFor
PGIM and PrudentialFor
Jackson National fundsFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesFor
SEIAgainst *
First TrustFor
Russell InvestmentsAgainst *
NationwideAgainst *
Brighthouse FundsAgainst
Global XAgainst *
Hartford FundsAgainst *
MassMutualFor
Harbor FundsFor
Neuberger BermanAgainst *
Natixis and Loomis SaylesFor
BairdFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20247164.0%3.1%
year to 30 June 202570527.3%11.8%
year to 30 June 202669022.2%14.2%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS14,97467.7%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES2,38210.8%
AUDIT-RELATED1,2295.6%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE1,1935.4%
COMPENSATION9414.3%
OTHER5332.4%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES3881.8%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES3641.6%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE760.3%
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE520.2%

Questions

How did large funds vote at CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 523 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED; 116 voted against management (22.2%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED?

No proposal from security holders was reported by enough filers to be shown for the year to 30 June 2026.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.