Vote Scores

Home / Companies / CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED / 30 Apr 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025695 filers reporting

CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED: meeting of 30 Apr 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

695 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED meeting of 30 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

12 nominees; 98.9% of reported votes for; 10 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

4,920 vote records from 236 filers. 1 of the 234 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.7% for0.4% against0.8% other0.4% against management236 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

880 vote records from 541 filers. 135 of the 495 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 46 filers reported this item without a management mark.

64.5% for25.7% against9.8% other27.3% against management541 filers86.0% for13.0% against1.0% other11.8% against management175,401,869 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

416 vote records from 236 filers. 2 of the 234 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.3% for0.0% against1.7% other0.9% against management236 filers99.3% for0.0% against0.7% other0.7% against management110,206,041 reported shares
4

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

364 vote records from 211 filers. 126 of the 209 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

38.9% for60.2% against0.9% other60.3% against management211 filers58.2% for41.8% against41.6% against management105,615,996 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

292 vote records from 158 filers. 11 of the 157 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

93.0% for6.3% against0.6% other7.0% against management158 filers94.9% for5.1% against5.1% against management107,699,732 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

76 vote records from 29 filers. 4 of the 27 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

79.3% for13.8% against6.9% other14.8% against management29 filers95.2% for4.8% against4.8% against management3,571,423 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATEIssuer

ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

396 vote records from 229 filers. 21 of the 228 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

90.4% for9.2% against0.4% other9.2% against management229 filers97.7% for2.3% against2.3% against management108,129,407 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

246 vote records from 16 filers. 2 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 13 filers reported this item without a management mark.

6.3% for12.5% against81.3% other66.7% against management16 filers65.6% for34.4% against34.4% against management335,411 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForNo reportFor
DimensionalForNo reportFor
State Street and SPDRForNo reportFor
American CenturyForNo reportFor
Franklin TempletonForNo reportFor
InvescoForNo reportFor
EquitableForNo reportFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForNo reportFor
ProShares and ProFundsForNo reportFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForNo reportFor
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsForNo reportFor
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *For
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForAgainst *For
T. Rowe PriceForNo reportFor
ThriventNo reportAgainst *No report
Lincoln FinancialForNo reportFor
VoyaForNo reportFor
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst *For
NationwideForAgainst *For
Victory CapitalForNo reportFor
Brighthouse FundsForAgainst *For
Guggenheim and RydexForNo reportFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForNo reportFor
BNY MellonForNo reportFor
PrincipalForNo reportFor
Pacific Life fundsForNo reportFor
Global XForAgainst *For
MFSForNo reportFor
TransamericaForNo reportFor
AllianceBernsteinForNo reportFor
Hartford FundsForAgainst *For
PIMCOForNo reportFor
AllspringForNo reportFor
MassMutualForForFor
Harbor FundsForForFor
VirtusForNo reportFor
Janus HendersonForNo reportFor
Neuberger BermanForAgainst *For
American BeaconForForFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForAgainst *Abstain or withhold *
BairdForForFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED meeting?

695 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 135 of 495 voted against management (27.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED with a meeting date within three days of 30 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.