Home / Companies / CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED / 29 Apr 2026
CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED: meeting of 29 Apr 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
684 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED meeting of 29 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
14 nominees; 99.3% of reported votes for; 10 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
5,055 vote records from 208 filers. 1 of the 207 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
854 vote records from 547 filers. 116 of the 523 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 24 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
358 vote records from 206 filers. 1 of the 205 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
234 vote records from 139 filers. 17 of the 139 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATEIssuer
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
353 vote records from 203 filers. 18 of the 202 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
254 vote records from 13 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
2 vote records from 2 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Equitable | For | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For |
| Voya | For | No report | For |
| First Trust | For | For | For |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For |
| Principal | For | No report | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For |
| Global X | For | Against * | For |
| MFS | For | No report | For |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against * | For |
| Allspring | For | No report | For |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For |
| Virtus | For | No report | For |
| Janus Henderson | For | No report | For |
| Neuberger Berman | For | Against * | For |
| American Beacon | For | No report | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For |
| Baird | For | For | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED meeting?
684 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 29 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 116 of 523 voted against management (22.2%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED with a meeting date within three days of 29 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.