Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Capgemini SE / 7 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025230 filers reporting

Capgemini SE: meeting of 7 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

230 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Capgemini SE meeting of 7 May 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

3 nominees; 82.9% of reported votes for; 96 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,179 vote records from 199 filers. 21 of the 195 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

88.9% for9.0% against2.0% other10.8% against management199 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

368 vote records from 61 filers. 2 of the 55 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

83.6% for3.3% against13.1% other3.6% against management61 filers97.6% for2.4% against0.0% other2.4% against management30,812,500 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

53 vote records from 33 filers. 0 of the 30 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

90.9% for0.0% against9.1% other0.0% against management33 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1,433,274 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

903 vote records from 199 filers. 0 of the 195 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.0% for0.0% against2.0% other0.0% against management199 filers99.8% for0.2% against0.2% against management81,924,670 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

3,093 vote records from 200 filers. 0 of the 196 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.0% for0.0% against2.0% other0.0% against management200 filers99.6% for0.4% against0.0% other0.4% against management326,630,066 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,692 vote records from 196 filers. 0 of the 192 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.0% for0.0% against2.0% other0.0% against management196 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management177,889,333 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

314 vote records from 23 filers. 0 of the 19 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

82.6% for0.0% against17.4% other0.0% against management23 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management5,278,100 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForNo reportFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForNo reportFor
DimensionalForNo reportNo report
State Street and SPDRForNo reportNo report
American CenturyForNo reportNo report
Franklin TempletonForNo reportNo report
InvescoForNo reportNo report
EquitableForNo reportFor
Charles SchwabAgainst *No reportFor
Nuveen and TIAAForNo reportNo report
John Hancock and ManulifeForForNo report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForNo reportNo report
J.P. MorganFor *ForFor
Goldman SachsForNo reportNo report
WisdomTreeForNo reportNo report
PGIM and PrudentialForNo reportFor
Jackson National fundsForForNo report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForNo report
SEIAgainst *No reportFor
T. Rowe PriceForNo reportNo report
ThriventForNo reportNo report
Lincoln FinancialForNo reportNo report
VoyaForNo reportNo report
First TrustForNo reportNo report
Russell InvestmentsAgainst *No reportFor
NationwideForNo reportNo report
Victory CapitalForNo reportNo report
Brighthouse FundsForNo reportNo report
Columbia ThreadneedleForNo reportNo report
BNY MellonForNo reportNo report
PrincipalForNo reportNo report
Capital Group and American FundsForNo reportNo report
Pacific Life fundsForNo reportNo report
MFSForNo reportNo report
TransamericaForNo reportNo report
Federated HermesAgainst *No reportFor
AllianceBernsteinForNo reportNo report
Hartford FundsAgainst *No reportFor
DWSForNo reportNo report
AllspringForNo reportNo report
MassMutualForForFor
Neuberger BermanAgainst *No reportFor
American BeaconForNo reportNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForNo report
Lord AbbettForNo reportNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkForNo reportNo report
Artisan PartnersForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Capgemini SE meeting?

230 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 7 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 2 of 55 voted against management (3.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Capgemini SE on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Capgemini SE

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Capgemini SE with a meeting date within three days of 7 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.