Home / Companies / CCR SA / 18 Apr 2024
CCR SA: meeting of 18 Apr 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
77 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the CCR SA meeting of 18 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
15 nominees; 12.3% of reported votes for; 68 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,917 vote records from 76 filers. 56 of the 74 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
3 vote records from 1 filers. 1 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
30 vote records from 7 filers. 0 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
173 vote records from 72 filers. 7 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 65 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
128 vote records from 75 filers. 0 of the 73 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
360 vote records from 76 filers. 9 of the 74 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
853 vote records from 75 filers. 4 of the 73 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
74 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | Abstain or withhold | No report |
| Fidelity | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| Dimensional | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| American Century | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| Invesco | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| Equitable | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| Charles Schwab | Abstain or withhold | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Abstain or withhold * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | Abstain or withhold * | For |
| WisdomTree | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| Jackson National funds | Abstain or withhold * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For * | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| Voya | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| First Trust | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| Russell Investments | Abstain or withhold | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | Split or no vote | No report |
| Principal | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| DWS | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Abstain or withhold * | No report |
| Cohen & Steers | Abstain or withhold * | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the CCR SA meeting?
77 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 18 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 1 of 1 voted against management (100.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by CCR SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for CCR SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing CCR SA with a meeting date within three days of 18 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026.