Home / Companies / CECONOMY AG / 26 Feb 2025
CECONOMY AG: meeting of 26 Feb 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
42 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the CECONOMY AG meeting of 26 Feb 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
5 nominees; 100.0% of reported votes for; no filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
297 vote records from 34 filers. 0 of the 34 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
27 vote records from 14 filers. 0 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
109 vote records from 34 filers. 0 of the 34 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
63 vote records from 34 filers. 0 of the 34 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
110 vote records from 35 filers. 0 of the 35 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
299 vote records from 34 filers. 0 of the 34 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
35 vote records from 5 filers. 0 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the CECONOMY AG meeting?
42 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 26 Feb 2025. On say-on-pay, 0 of 14 voted against management (0.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by CECONOMY AG on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for CECONOMY AG
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing CECONOMY AG with a meeting date within three days of 26 Feb 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.