Home / Companies / Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. / 6 Jun 2024
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.: meeting of 6 Jun 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,298 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. meeting of 6 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 11 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 97.9% of reported votes for; 24 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
9,370 vote records from 372 filers. 6 of the 371 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,052 vote records from 1,275 filers. 70 of the 1,250 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 25 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
935 vote records from 369 filers. 10 of the 368 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
930 vote records from 366 filers. 4 of the 365 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
36 vote records from 19 filers. 1 of the 19 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
937 vote records from 364 filers. 8 of the 362 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Human rights or human capital/workforce
862 vote records from 348 filers. 99 of the 347 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal - Requesting an audit of safety practices.
1,040 vote records from 361 filers. 139 of the 360 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal - Requesting a report on harassment and discrimination statistics.
861 vote records from 347 filers. 90 of the 346 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal - Requesting adoption of a non-interference policy.
730 vote records from 292 filers. 42 of the 292 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
168 vote records from 24 filers. 7 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | No report | Against | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Split or no vote | Against | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Abstain or withhold * | Abstain or withhold * | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | Split or no vote | For * | No report |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against * | Against | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | Against * | Against | For * | For * | No report |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | Against * | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Abstain or withhold * |
| Virtus | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Split or no vote | For * | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. meeting?
1,298 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 70 of 1,250 voted against management (5.6%). 4 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 6 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.