Home / Companies / Citigroup Inc. / 29 Apr 2025
Citigroup Inc.: meeting of 29 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,716 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Citigroup Inc. meeting of 29 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 96.5% of reported votes for; 63 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
13,914 vote records from 450 filers. 2 of the 445 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
3,010 vote records from 1,686 filers. 96 of the 1,640 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 46 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on pay tied to a merger or sale
169 vote records from 25 filers. 14 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,163 vote records from 446 filers. 8 of the 441 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,253 vote records from 462 filers. 135 of the 455 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal requesting a shareholder vote regarding excessive golden parachutes.
1,152 vote records from 455 filers. 170 of the 444 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Stockholder proposal requesting a report on financial statement assumptions and climate change.
1,145 vote records from 435 filers. 30 of the 428 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal requesting a report disclosing the Board's oversight regarding material risks...
1,139 vote records from 433 filers. 44 of the 425 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Report on Respecting Indigenous Peoples' Rights
1,152 vote records from 436 filers. 69 of the 427 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
64 vote records from 21 filers. 8 of the 20 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * | Against | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * | Against * | Against | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | Against * | For * | Against | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Citigroup Inc. meeting?
1,716 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 29 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 96 of 1,640 voted against management (5.9%). 4 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Citigroup Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Citigroup Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Citigroup Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 29 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.