Home / Companies / Citigroup Inc. / 30 Apr 2024
Citigroup Inc.: meeting of 30 Apr 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,565 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Citigroup Inc. meeting of 30 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 12 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 96.5% of reported votes for; 64 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
13,678 vote records from 400 filers. 1 of the 397 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,530 vote records from 1,516 filers. 77 of the 1,439 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 77 filers reported this item without a management mark.
6 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,052 vote records from 396 filers. 12 of the 393 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,114 vote records from 415 filers. 132 of the 412 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
131 vote records from 22 filers. 2 of the 16 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Report on Respecting Indigenous Peoples' Rights
1,001 vote records from 383 filers. 127 of the 380 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal requesting a report to Shareholders on risks created by the Company's diversity,...
931 vote records from 359 filers. 24 of the 356 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal requesting a report disclosing the Board's oversight regarding material risks...
932 vote records from 358 filers. 45 of the 356 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal requesting a report on risks of Politicized De-banking.
932 vote records from 360 filers. 24 of the 357 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Stockholder proposal requesting an Independent Board Chairman policy.
933 vote records from 359 filers. 59 of the 356 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESSecurity holder
Stockholder has withdrawn this Proposal.
261 vote records from 111 filers. 44 of the 59 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 52 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
389 vote records from 60 filers. 5 of the 41 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 19 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * | Against | For * | Against | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | Against * | For * | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| PIMCO | For | For | Against * | For * | Against | For * | Against | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Citigroup Inc. meeting?
1,565 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 77 of 1,439 voted against management (5.4%). 6 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Citigroup Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Citigroup Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Citigroup Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 30 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.