Home / Companies / Comcast Corporation / 18 Jun 2025
Comcast Corporation: meeting of 18 Jun 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,865 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Comcast Corporation meeting of 18 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 78.9% of reported votes for; 320 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
12,521 vote records from 449 filers. 20 of the 447 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
3,197 vote records from 1,834 filers. 213 of the 1,783 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 51 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,275 vote records from 445 filers. 14 of the 443 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
210 vote records from 85 filers. 1 of the 85 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,476 vote records from 459 filers. 23 of the 455 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Adopt policy for an independent chair
1,227 vote records from 429 filers. 233 of the 424 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Improve Executive Compensation Program and Policy
920 vote records from 324 filers. 20 of the 322 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
19 vote records from 5 filers. 1 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Equitable | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | For * | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | For * | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | For * | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Voya | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | For * | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For | For * | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Against * | For | For * | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | Against * | For | For * | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | For * | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | Against * | For * | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Allspring | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | For * | No report |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | For * | Against |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | For * | No report |
| Lord Abbett | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Comcast Corporation meeting?
1,865 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 18 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 213 of 1,783 voted against management (11.9%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Comcast Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Comcast Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Comcast Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 18 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.