Home / Companies / Credit Agricole SA / 14 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025149 filers reporting

Credit Agricole SA: meeting of 14 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

149 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Credit Agricole SA meeting of 14 May 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

6 nominees; 22.6% of reported votes for; 116 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,469 vote records from 128 filers. 87 of the 125 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

28.1% for68.8% against3.1% other69.6% against management128 filers

2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

601 vote records from 36 filers. 3 of the 32 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

83.3% for5.6% against11.1% other9.4% against management36 filers

3

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer

EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

105 vote records from 13 filers. 1 of the 13 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

92.3% for0.0% against7.7% other7.7% against management13 filers99.2% for0.0% against0.8% other0.8% against management17,761,260 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

552 vote records from 128 filers. 0 of the 125 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.9% for0.0% against3.1% other0.0% against management128 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.1% against management156,669,046 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

3,939 vote records from 129 filers. 0 of the 126 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.7% for0.0% against2.3% other0.0% against management129 filers97.9% for2.1% against0.0% other2.0% against management1,183,495,924 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,990 vote records from 127 filers. 0 of the 124 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.6% for0.0% against2.4% other0.0% against management127 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management630,850,153 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

297 vote records from 17 filers. 0 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

82.4% for0.0% against17.6% other0.0% against management17 filers99.5% for0.5% against0.5% against management6,026,700 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

8

COMPENSATIONSecurity holder

Amending Items 31 and 32 of Current Meeting to Apply a Discount on Shares

239 vote records from 125 filers. 4 of the 122 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.8% for95.2% against4.0% other3.3% against management125 filers0.1% for98.5% against1.4% other1.7% against management71,318,633 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family	1. Directors	2. Say-on-pay	8. Proposal
Vanguard	For	No report	Against
BlackRock and iShares	No report	For	No report
Fidelity	Against *	No report	Against
Dimensional	Against *	No report	Against
State Street and SPDR	Against *	No report	Against
American Century	Against *	No report	Against
Franklin Templeton	Against *	No report	Against
Invesco	For	No report	Against
Equitable	For	No report	Against
Charles Schwab	For	No report	Against
Nuveen and TIAA	Against *	No report	Against
John Hancock and Manulife	Against *	For	Against
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert	Against *	No report	Against
J.P. Morgan	For	For	Against
Goldman Sachs	For	No report	Against
WisdomTree	Against *	No report	Against
PGIM and Prudential	For	No report	Against
Jackson National funds	Against *	For	Against
Northern Trust and FlexShares	For	For	Against
T. Rowe Price	Against *	No report	Against
Thrivent	Against *	No report	Against
Lincoln Financial	Against	No report	Against *
Voya	Against *	No report	Against
First Trust	Against *	No report	Against
Russell Investments	For	No report	Against
Nationwide	For	No report	Against
Victory Capital	Against *	No report	Against
Brighthouse Funds	Against *	No report	Against
Columbia Threadneedle	Abstain or withhold *	No report	Against
BNY Mellon	Against *	No report	Against
Principal	Against *	No report	Against
Pacific Life funds	Against *	No report	Against
Global X	For	No report	No report
Transamerica	Against *	No report	Against
Federated Hermes	Against *	No report	Against
AllianceBernstein	Against *	No report	Against
DWS	Against *	No report	Against
PIMCO	Against *	No report	Against
Allspring	Against *	No report	Against
Harbor Funds	Against *	For	Against
Natixis and Loomis Sayles	For	For	Against

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Credit Agricole SA meeting?

149 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 14 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 3 of 32 voted against management (9.4%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Credit Agricole SA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Credit Agricole SA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Credit Agricole SA with a meeting date within three days of 14 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.