Home / Companies / CVS Health Corporation / 16 May 2024
CVS Health Corporation: meeting of 16 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,673 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the CVS Health Corporation meeting of 16 May 2024. Their records fall into 11 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 97.3% of reported votes for; 39 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
12,756 vote records from 399 filers. 3 of the 396 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,880 vote records from 1,638 filers. 164 of the 1,588 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 50 filers reported this item without a management mark.
5 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on pay tied to a merger or sale
45 vote records from 23 filers. 14 of the 23 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,065 vote records from 395 filers. 8 of the 392 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,200 vote records from 411 filers. 16 of the 408 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
133 vote records from 25 filers. 7 of the 23 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Stockholder Proposal Requesting an Independent, Third Party Worker Rights Assessment and Report.
1,028 vote records from 380 filers. 134 of the 379 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (A)
1,008 vote records from 375 filers. 5 of the 374 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Stockholder Proposal for a Stockholder Right to Vote on "Excessive" Golden Parachutes.
964 vote records from 371 filers. 23 of the 369 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (B)
957 vote records from 364 filers. 85 of the 362 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
169 vote records from 30 filers. 9 of the 30 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | For * | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | Against * | For * | Against | For * | Against |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the CVS Health Corporation meeting?
1,673 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 16 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 164 of 1,588 voted against management (10.3%). 4 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by CVS Health Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for CVS Health Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing CVS Health Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 16 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.