Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Eli Lilly and Company / 5 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 20252,166 filers reporting

Eli Lilly and Company: meeting of 5 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

2,166 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Eli Lilly and Company meeting of 5 May 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

4 nominees; 87.6% of reported votes for; 83 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

7,342 vote records from 573 filers. 7 of the 567 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.4% for0.9% against1.7% other1.2% against management573 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

4,473 vote records from 2,133 filers. 92 of the 2,070 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 63 filers reported this item without a management mark.

92.4% for4.0% against3.6% other4.4% against management2,133 filers97.5% for2.5% against0.0% other2.4% against management792,076,745 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

1,592 vote records from 569 filers. 16 of the 563 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.3% for2.6% against1.1% other2.8% against management569 filers99.6% for0.4% against0.0% other0.3% against management273,941,094 reported shares
4

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,818 vote records from 545 filers. 1 of the 539 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

99.1% for0.0% against0.9% other0.2% against management545 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management330,332,066 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

95 vote records from 31 filers. 0 of the 31 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

96.8% for0.0% against3.2% other0.0% against management31 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1,974,106 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,511 vote records from 483 filers. 2 of the 479 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

99.0% for0.2% against0.8% other0.4% against management483 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management217,380,809 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1,593 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForForFor
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForForFor
Franklin TempletonForForFor
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForForFor
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForFor
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsForForFor
WisdomTreeForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForFor
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForForFor
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
ThriventForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForForFor
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsForForFor
NationwideForForFor
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonForForFor
PrincipalForForFor
Capital Group and American FundsForForFor
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForForFor
MFSForForFor
TransamericaForForFor
Federated HermesForForFor
AllianceBernsteinForForFor
Hartford FundsForForFor
DWSForForFor
PIMCOForForFor
AllspringForForFor
MassMutualForForFor
Harbor FundsForForFor
VirtusForAgainst *Against *
VanEckForForFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForFor
Janus HendersonForForFor
Neuberger BermanForForFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForFor
Lord AbbettForForFor
Dodge & CoxNo reportForNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForNo report
BairdNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Eli Lilly and Company meeting?

2,166 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 5 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 92 of 2,070 voted against management (4.4%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Eli Lilly and Company on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Eli Lilly and Company

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Eli Lilly and Company with a meeting date within three days of 5 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.