Home / Companies / Eli Lilly and Company / 6 May 2024
Eli Lilly and Company: meeting of 6 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
2,003 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Eli Lilly and Company meeting of 6 May 2024. Their records fall into 11 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
4 nominees; 94.8% of reported votes for; 125 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
6,349 vote records from 550 filers. 3 of the 546 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
4,197 vote records from 1,953 filers. 101 of the 1,899 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 54 filers reported this item without a management mark.
6 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,581 vote records from 546 filers. 20 of the 542 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,744 vote records from 523 filers. 1 of the 520 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
127 vote records from 45 filers. 3 of the 45 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,426 vote records from 481 filers. 2 of the 477 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal to adopt a comprehensive human rights policy
1,427 vote records from 500 filers. 76 of the 497 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal to report on effectiveness of the company's diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts.
1,424 vote records from 497 filers. 213 of the 494 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal to establish and report on a process by which the impact of extended patent...
1,501 vote records from 524 filers. 84 of the 521 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal to publish an annual report disclosing lobbying activities.
1,499 vote records from 523 filers. 215 of the 521 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
2 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
276 vote records from 48 filers. 11 of the 48 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Abstain or withhold * |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against * | Against | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | Against * | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Eli Lilly and Company meeting?
2,003 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 101 of 1,899 voted against management (5.3%). 4 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Eli Lilly and Company on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Eli Lilly and Company
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Eli Lilly and Company with a meeting date within three days of 6 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.