Home / Companies / EMS-Chemie Holding AG / 9 Aug 2025
EMS-Chemie Holding AG: meeting of 9 Aug 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
88 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the EMS-Chemie Holding AG meeting of 9 Aug 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
4 nominees; 52.9% of reported votes for; 55 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
641 vote records from 85 filers. 18 of the 73 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
4 vote records from 2 filers. 1 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
155 vote records from 85 filers. 1 of the 73 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
155 vote records from 85 filers. 1 of the 73 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
310 vote records from 85 filers. 1 of the 73 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
700 vote records from 85 filers. 1 of the 73 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 12 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
35 vote records from 13 filers. 1 of the 13 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
137 vote records from 21 filers. 0 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 10 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Dimensional | Split or no vote | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For |
| American Century | For | For |
| Franklin Templeton | Split or no vote | For |
| Invesco | For | For |
| Equitable | Against * | For |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Split or no vote | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | For |
| J.P. Morgan | Against * | For |
| WisdomTree | Split or no vote | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Jackson National funds | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For |
| SEI | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| T. Rowe Price | Split or no vote | For |
| Thrivent | Split or no vote | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For |
| Voya | Split or no vote | For |
| Russell Investments | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Nationwide | Against * | For |
| Victory Capital | For | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | Against | For |
| BNY Mellon | Split or no vote | For |
| Principal | For | For |
| Transamerica | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | For |
| Hartford Funds | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| PIMCO | Split or no vote | For |
| Allspring | For | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the EMS-Chemie Holding AG meeting?
88 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 9 Aug 2025. On say-on-pay, 1 of 2 voted against management (50.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by EMS-Chemie Holding AG on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for EMS-Chemie Holding AG
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing EMS-Chemie Holding AG with a meeting date within three days of 9 Aug 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.