Home / Companies / EQUINOR ASA / 12 May 2026
EQUINOR ASA: meeting of 12 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
250 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the EQUINOR ASA meeting of 12 May 2026. Their records fall into 18 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
16 nominees; 92.7% of reported votes for; 2 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,600 vote records from 59 filers. 1 of the 55 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
216 vote records from 190 filers. 51 of the 182 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
115 vote records from 69 filers. 1 of the 65 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
405 vote records from 69 filers. 0 of the 65 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
347 vote records from 71 filers. 1 of the 68 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,043 vote records from 68 filers. 1 of the 65 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATEIssuer
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
55 vote records from 11 filers. 5 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
135 vote records from 33 filers. 6 of the 32 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Divestment of International Fossil Fuel Business
87 vote records from 55 filers. 2 of the 52 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTURESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CAPITAL STRUCTURE
87 vote records from 55 filers. 2 of the 52 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE (A)
87 vote records from 55 filers. 4 of the 52 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Splitting Renewable Energy from the Company
87 vote records from 55 filers. 2 of the 52 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Strategy Under Declining Oil and Gas Demand
87 vote records from 55 filers. 5 of the 52 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE (B)
59 vote records from 36 filers. 2 of the 34 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Regarding GHG Targets and Alignment with the Paris Agreement
59 vote records from 36 filers. 3 of the 34 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Approve Proposal that the Company Shall Bolster and Execute Its Energy Plan for a Green Transition and...
28 vote records from 20 filers. 1 of the 19 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Request Company to Set Paris-aligned Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Targets
27 vote records from 19 filers. 3 of the 19 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal | 11. Proposal | 12. Proposal | 13. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | No report | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| SEI | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For | Against * | Against * | Against * | Against * | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Harbor Funds | No report | Against * | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| VanEck | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Lord Abbett | For | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the EQUINOR ASA meeting?
250 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 12 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 51 of 182 voted against management (28.0%). 9 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by EQUINOR ASA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for EQUINOR ASA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing EQUINOR ASA with a meeting date within three days of 12 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.