Home / Companies / Essity AB / 27 Mar 2025
Essity AB: meeting of 27 Mar 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
152 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Essity AB meeting of 27 Mar 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 85.0% of reported votes for; 85 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
3,444 vote records from 132 filers. 1 of the 109 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 23 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
130 vote records from 48 filers. 1 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 10 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
829 vote records from 132 filers. 1 of the 109 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 23 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,099 vote records from 132 filers. 0 of the 109 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 23 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
739 vote records from 134 filers. 1 of the 111 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 23 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
5,482 vote records from 132 filers. 1 of the 109 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 23 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
566 vote records from 22 filers. 0 of the 15 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
2 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Equitable | For | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For |
| Voya | For | No report | For |
| First Trust | For | No report | For |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For |
| Principal | For | No report | For |
| Pacific Life funds | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| MFS | For | No report | For |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | No report | For |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For |
| Allspring | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| MassMutual | For | For | For |
| Virtus | For | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Essity AB meeting?
152 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 27 Mar 2025. On say-on-pay, 1 of 38 voted against management (2.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Essity AB on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Essity AB
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Essity AB with a meeting date within three days of 27 Mar 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.