Home / Companies / Evonik Industries AG / 3 Jun 2026
Evonik Industries AG: meeting of 3 Jun 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
129 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Evonik Industries AG meeting of 3 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 100.0% of reported votes for; no filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
54 vote records from 12 filers. 0 of the 12 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
149 vote records from 41 filers. 17 of the 35 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
442 vote records from 114 filers. 0 of the 108 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
662 vote records from 115 filers. 1 of the 109 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
364 vote records from 104 filers. 3 of the 98 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
626 vote records from 114 filers. 0 of the 108 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
130 vote records from 8 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | No report | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | No report | No report | For |
| Dimensional | No report | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | No report | No report | For |
| American Century | No report | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | No report | No report | For |
| Invesco | No report | No report | For |
| Equitable | No report | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | No report | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | No report | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | No report | No report | For |
| WisdomTree | No report | No report | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | No report | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | No report | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | Against * | For |
| SEI | No report | No report | For |
| T. Rowe Price | No report | No report | For |
| Thrivent | No report | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | No report | No report | For |
| Voya | No report | No report | For |
| First Trust | No report | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | No report | No report | For |
| Nationwide | No report | No report | For |
| Victory Capital | No report | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | No report | No report | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | No report | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | No report | No report | For |
| Principal | No report | No report | Split or no vote |
| Pacific Life funds | No report | No report | For |
| Global X | No report | No report | For |
| Transamerica | No report | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | No report | No report | For |
| Harbor Funds | No report | Against * | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Evonik Industries AG meeting?
129 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 3 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 17 of 35 voted against management (48.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Evonik Industries AG on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Evonik Industries AG
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Evonik Industries AG with a meeting date within three days of 3 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.