Home / Companies / Fortum Oyj / 1 Apr 2025
Fortum Oyj: meeting of 1 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
135 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Fortum Oyj meeting of 1 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
1 nominee; 70.2% of reported votes for; 40 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
272 vote records from 115 filers. 31 of the 112 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
160 vote records from 39 filers. 2 of the 37 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
754 vote records from 115 filers. 0 of the 112 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
268 vote records from 115 filers. 0 of the 112 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
681 vote records from 116 filers. 0 of the 113 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
932 vote records from 115 filers. 0 of the 112 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
243 vote records from 115 filers. 0 of the 112 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
352 vote records from 18 filers. 0 of the 15 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Against * | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | Against * | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | No report | For |
| American Century | Against * | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Equitable | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against * | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | Against * | No report | For |
| Voya | For | No report | For |
| First Trust | For | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For |
| Principal | For | No report | For |
| Global X | For | No report | For |
| Transamerica | Against * | No report | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | No report | For |
| DWS | For | No report | For |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For |
| Allspring | For | No report | For |
| Harbor Funds | Against * | For | For |
| Virtus | For | No report | For |
| VanEck | For | No report | For |
| American Beacon | For | No report | For |
| Artisan Partners | For | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Fortum Oyj meeting?
135 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 1 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 2 of 37 voted against management (5.4%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Fortum Oyj on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Fortum Oyj
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Fortum Oyj with a meeting date within three days of 1 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.