Home / Companies / Galderma Group AG / 22 Apr 2026
Galderma Group AG: meeting of 22 Apr 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
216 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Galderma Group AG meeting of 22 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 86.5% of reported votes for; 33 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
3,907 vote records from 188 filers. 6 of the 160 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 28 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
2 nominees; 85.6% of reported votes for; 28 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
608 vote records from 157 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 156 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
163 vote records from 67 filers. 34 of the 58 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
377 vote records from 188 filers. 1 of the 160 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 28 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
376 vote records from 188 filers. 0 of the 160 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 28 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,055 vote records from 188 filers. 92 of the 160 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 28 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
2,159 vote records from 189 filers. 0 of the 161 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 28 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
71 vote records from 36 filers. 0 of the 33 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
169 vote records from 26 filers. 0 of the 23 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
2 vote records from 1 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | Against * | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | For | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | For | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | For | No report | For |
| Equitable | For | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | No report | No report | Split or no vote |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | No report | For |
| WisdomTree | For | For | No report | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against | Against * | For |
| SEI | Split or no vote | No report | No report | Split or no vote |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | No report | For |
| Thrivent | For | For | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | Against * | For |
| Voya | For | For | No report | For |
| First Trust | For | For | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | Split or no vote | No report | No report | Split or no vote |
| Nationwide | Split or no vote | For | No report | Split or no vote |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | No report | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against | No report | For |
| Principal | For | For | No report | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | No report | For |
| Transamerica | For | For | No report | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | Against | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | Split or no vote | No report | No report | Split or no vote |
| DWS | For | For | No report | For |
| PIMCO | For | For | No report | For |
| MassMutual | For | For | Against * | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | For |
| Virtus | For | For | No report | For |
| Neuberger Berman | Split or no vote | No report | No report | Split or no vote |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | No report | For |
| Baird | For | For | Against * | For |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Galderma Group AG meeting?
216 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 22 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 34 of 58 voted against management (58.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Galderma Group AG on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Galderma Group AG
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Galderma Group AG with a meeting date within three days of 22 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.