Home / Companies / H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB / 5 May 2026
H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB: meeting of 5 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
120 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB meeting of 5 May 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 78.3% of reported votes for; 65 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,161 vote records from 104 filers. 8 of the 93 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
141 vote records from 37 filers. 15 of the 33 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
594 vote records from 104 filers. 1 of the 93 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
656 vote records from 104 filers. 1 of the 93 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,055 vote records from 104 filers. 1 of the 93 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
4,195 vote records from 104 filers. 1 of the 93 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
160 vote records from 16 filers. 0 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Approve Prohibition of the Use of Mohair; Request the Board to Consider Developing a Plan to Phase out All...
196 vote records from 102 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 101 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | Against |
| American Century | For | No report | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | Against |
| Invesco | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Equitable | Against * | No report | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | No report | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For | Against |
| Voya | Against * | No report | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For | Against |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | Against | No report | For | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | Against |
| Principal | For | No report | For | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Global X | For | No report | For | For |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | No report | For | Against |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report | For | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB meeting?
120 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 5 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 15 of 33 voted against management (45.5%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB with a meeting date within three days of 5 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.