Home / Companies / Holcim Ltd. / 13 May 2026
Holcim Ltd.: meeting of 13 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
205 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Holcim Ltd. meeting of 13 May 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
14 nominees; 93.3% of reported votes for; no filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
4,783 vote records from 180 filers. 0 of the 143 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 37 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
167 vote records from 59 filers. 0 of the 49 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 10 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
372 vote records from 180 filers. 0 of the 143 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 37 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
743 vote records from 180 filers. 0 of the 143 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 37 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,043 vote records from 180 filers. 0 of the 143 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 37 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
2,188 vote records from 181 filers. 0 of the 144 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 37 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
70 vote records from 32 filers. 0 of the 29 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
177 vote records from 25 filers. 1 of the 20 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Equitable | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For |
| Voya | For | No report | For |
| First Trust | For | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For |
| Principal | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | For |
| Pacific Life funds | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| Global X | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For |
| Neuberger Berman | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| Lord Abbett | For | No report | For |
| Dodge & Cox | For | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Holcim Ltd. meeting?
205 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 13 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 0 of 49 voted against management (0.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Holcim Ltd. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Holcim Ltd.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Holcim Ltd. with a meeting date within three days of 13 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.