Vote Scores

Home / Companies / IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC / 29 Jan 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025115 filers reporting

IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC: meeting of 29 Jan 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

115 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC meeting of 29 Jan 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

10 nominees; 100.0% of reported votes for; no filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

90 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management8 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

117 vote records from 109 filers. 5 of the 108 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

94.5% for4.6% against0.9% other4.6% against management109 filers99.2% for0.6% against0.1% other0.8% against management3,960,024 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

20 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management8 filers
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

36 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management8 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management21,750,520 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

7 vote records from 6 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management6 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management5,424,135 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

13 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management8 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management10,835,428 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

7 vote records from 7 filers. 0 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management7 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management5,437,606 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

5 vote records from 4 filers. 0 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management4 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management39,832 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
BlackRock and iSharesNo reportForNo report
FidelityForNo reportFor
J.P. MorganNo reportForNo report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesNo reportForNo report
First TrustNo reportAgainst *No report
MassMutualNo reportForNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesNo reportForNo report
Dodge & CoxForNo reportFor
BairdNo reportForNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC meeting?

115 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 29 Jan 2025. On say-on-pay, 5 of 108 voted against management (4.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC with a meeting date within three days of 29 Jan 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.