Home / Companies / Intel Corporation / 7 May 2024
Intel Corporation: meeting of 7 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,785 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Intel Corporation meeting of 7 May 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 94.1% of reported votes for; 95 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
13,832 vote records from 400 filers. 7 of the 396 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,846 vote records from 1,737 filers. 130 of the 1,686 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 51 filers reported this item without a management mark.
5 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on pay tied to a merger or sale
65 vote records from 36 filers. 20 of the 36 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,061 vote records from 397 filers. 22 of the 393 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
159 vote records from 43 filers. 3 of the 41 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal requesting a risk report of opposing state abortion regulation
997 vote records from 386 filers. 26 of the 383 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal requesting a corporate financial sustainability board committee
973 vote records from 383 filers. 20 of the 379 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal requesting an excessive golden parachute approval policy
915 vote records from 379 filers. 39 of the 374 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
173 vote records from 38 filers. 7 of the 37 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | No report |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Abstain or withhold * | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Abstain or withhold * | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | Against * | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Abstain or withhold * | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | Against * | Against | Against | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Intel Corporation meeting?
1,785 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 7 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 130 of 1,686 voted against management (7.7%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Intel Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Intel Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Intel Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 7 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.