Home / Companies / Intel Corporation / 6 May 2025
Intel Corporation: meeting of 6 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,693 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Intel Corporation meeting of 6 May 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 94.7% of reported votes for; 91 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
9,271 vote records from 333 filers. 7 of the 327 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,691 vote records from 1,670 filers. 590 of the 1,611 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 59 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
845 vote records from 327 filers. 17 of the 321 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
902 vote records from 336 filers. 127 of the 329 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Stockholder proposal requesting shareholder right to act by written consent
781 vote records from 306 filers. 127 of the 300 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Stockholder proposal requesting a report on charitable giving
771 vote records from 312 filers. 18 of the 307 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Stockholder proposal requesting a report on an ethical impact assessment
757 vote records from 305 filers. 43 of the 300 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
85 vote records from 17 filers. 5 of the 16 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Abstain or withhold * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | Against * | For * | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | Against | Abstain or withhold * |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | Against * | Against | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | For * |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Allspring | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | No report | Against | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Intel Corporation meeting?
1,693 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 590 of 1,611 voted against management (36.6%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Intel Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Intel Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Intel Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 6 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.